Session: Gaseous Hydrogen Embrittlement (Part I of II)
Hydrogen embrittlement resistance of stainless steels under gaseous hydrogen a cryogenic temperatures (C2026-00075)
Tuesday, March 17, 2026
9:30 AM - 10:00 AM Central
Location: 381 AB
Earn .5 PDH
Interested in reading the entire paper? Click on the "Paper" button below to read on the AMPP Knowledge Hub!
*Please note, if your registration came with access to the conference proceedings don't forget to login to your AMPP Knowledge Hub account to access the paper for free. If you login and don't have access to the paper, you can purchase the individual paper or purchase the entire conference proceedings on your Knowledge Hub account.
Christophe Mendibide, Laura Moli-Sanchez, Driss BEN MOUHAMED, Jamila Adem
Austenitic stainless steels are known for their ability to achieve high strength while maintaining excellent ductility at cryogenic temperatures. As such, they are considered promising candidate materials for storage and transportation applications under these extreme conditions. Extensive data is available in the literature regarding the embrittlement of 316L stainless steel in gaseous hydrogen at cryogenic temperatures, with peak susceptibility typically reported between -80°C and -100°C. This susceptibility is often attributed to the instability of the austenitic phase and the formation of strain-induced martensite during mechanical loading. In this study, the behavior of 316L stainless steel under hydrogen pressure at cryogenic temperatures is investigated. The primary focus is on assessing the effect of hydrogen partial pressure on materials produced through various manufacturing routes, including conventional processes and additive manufacturing. Differences between grades 1.4404 and 1.4435 are also examined. The results confirm that austenite stability plays a primary role in determining material behavior. However, XRD and EBSD analyses reveal that strain-induced martensitic transformation alone does not fully account for the observed phenomena. Additionally, it is evident that materials produced via additive manufacturing exhibit distinct behavior, including a shift in the temperature of maximum susceptibility, depending on the specific production process used.
